On 16 Mar 2015, at 12:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
a) This change impacts users, while these COPRs are not useful to
them.
There are no COPR repo files that are installed by default today,
which means none of them use this mechanism yet. Which means there is
literally no change for any user at this time. As I said, the Change
is informational.
If such repo files are installed by default, it will be at the
discretion of the various Working Groups not the Change proposer.
Why would an official "product" want to endorse "unofficial" repos?
If the working group deems the software to be that useful, wouldn't
it be better to bring its packaging up to the quality of the
"official" Fedora repo, and make it more easily discoverable by all
Fedora users, regardless of whether they choose to use that "product"
or a spin or a "non-product" install of Fedora?
Just asking what the thinking is here ...
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
