On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 16:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 15:25 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Other examples might be preview releases of certain software that > > are not yet stable enough to be in Fedora proper or whose > > installation might be too disruptive during a stable lifecycle. > > Like for example the recent GNOME 3.12 repositories for Fedora 20 > > users since we had the long cycle. > > This is a bad example IMO. We are not set up to handle coprs that > include essential system packages. If you try to remove the gnome- > 3.12 copr with gnome-software, it just uninstalls your desktop > environment and leaves you with a broken computer. > Good point. I forgot to account for the lack of a way to back out of it when I listed that. > Installing a single application that's not in Fedora from a copr is > one thing, or a newer version of an application, but not if they are > core system packages. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
