On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:41:45AM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2015-03-04, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * #615 Strategy for services that do not have systemd native unit files > > (ajax, 18:03:09) > > * AGREED: drop sysvinit subpackages if a systemd unit file exists, in > > f23 (ajax, 18:17:32) > > * AGREED: drop sysvinit subpackages if a systemd unit file exists, in > > f23 (ajax, 18:18:00) > > * ACTION: ajax to prune sysvinit subpackages in f23 (ajax, 18:22:03) > > > What? The topic was "services that do not have systemd native unit files" > but the decision was on "subpackages if a systemd unit file exists"? > > In other words, the decision was about completly different set of packages? Yes, but this decision makes sense imho. The way I understand FESCo members' reasoning is: 1. dropping sysinit support in packages *with* systemd unit files is the first step. 2. it is too late to do anything for F22 anyway, and after 1. is done, the issue can be revisited for packages *without* direct systemd support. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
