Re: Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 26, 2015 9:01 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while running
> > rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territory.  If I'm not the
> > only one, would it make sense to include appropriate sysctl snippets in
> > fedora-release-rawhide ?
> We could ship /etc/sysctl.d/sysrq-enable.conf.disabled (name up for discussion),
> and interested users could enable it by renaming the file. Maybe even better
> to provide it the same in all versions.
>
> Zbyszek
> --
>

All versions might be overkill, but I don't see the harm in the added convenience, either.  What's the next step?

--Pete

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux