On 02/25/2015 02:15 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively
only x86_64
If you are going down that road you better ask for every <arch> kernel SIG
to emerge or step up in the process.
Where does ARM fit in this plan
The ARM SIG has always been primary on the ARM kernel and associated issues.
For that matter so have aarch64/ppc64/s390 SIGs
Should not the kernel list be renamed to x86_64 to be in-line with and
follow the tradition of the other architectures mailinglist setup?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
