On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform >>> >>> >>> Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively >>> only x86_64 >>> >>> If you are going down that road you better ask for every <arch> kernel SIG >>> to emerge or step up in the process. >>> >>> Where does ARM fit in this plan >> >> The ARM SIG has always been primary on the ARM kernel and associated issues. > > For that matter so have aarch64/ppc64/s390 SIGs Yes, and they are model examples of teams passionate about something and working towards it. I try and give all the credit for the success of those architectures to those teams whenever possible. The Fedora kernel engineers do very very little for those kernels, so a hearty thank you once more. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
