|
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at Fedora installation , and a way to stop must be available , too. These issues must be in control by user . Kind Regards Mosaab > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:44:59 -0500 > From: mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?! > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:37:44AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > My friend didn't have enabled auto-update. > > There was an earlier discussion here. Even without updates > automatically applied, metadata about potential updates is downloaded > automatically. > > > > He completely Surprised of un-human-authorized connection by fedora. > > Preventing automatic system network interactions is not explicitly a > project goal, and we don't have any strong guidelines on this. If you > think it _should_ be, you wouldn't be alone — but on the other hand, > there are strong user benefits in making sure the system is up to date, > there's no waiting for metadata downloads, network connectivity is correct, > and so on; so, you'll need to build a strong case that this concern is > the most important. > > > He disabled these actions by : > > sudo echo 127.0.0.1 vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org proxy3.fedoraproject.org apps.fedoraproject.org 6-55-236-85.rev.customer-net.de >> /etc/hosts > > Since these connections really are innocuous, this seems more likely to > do harm than good, but of course your friend can do this if wanted. > > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
