Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 22.02.2015 um 21:59 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared
by NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .

the problem is that *nobody* knows what you are talking about

THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!

you first need to define the "this" before talk about definitions

and if you are at it

* don't post HTML
* don't post right aligned content in english

Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:48:57 +0100
From: h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!

Am 22.02.2015 um 21:41 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.

And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!

He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates
enabled and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
proxy3.fedoraproject.org

And both directed tohttps://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps


I check my (||lsof -i :443 ) ||and didn't detect any connection ..
---------

Can any body explain ...

"He got a two domains without any control of him" makes no sense

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux