On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 04:33:41AM +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: > > Any new package that is *not* going to be part of the install media set > > is required to pass a lighter review and is permitted to carry bundled > > libraries, with caveats to be listed below. > What would be the place for higher-quality packages that aren't on any > install media (and are also not required to create those)? I think a > broad collection of reviewed and guideline-conforming packages is a > useful thing to have. Just mixing them together in a single repo with > the lower-quality stuff would diminish their value in significant ways. Yeah, in my original rings proposal, I had something called Fedora Commons to represent this. Turns out that name is probably not the best choice, as it is used by the _other_ Fedora, the digital archiving system, so maybe "Fedora Collection" or something. Stephen's proposal doesn't have anything like that. I agree it's a good idea, but on the other hand I don't want to hold off experimenting with ideas until we have an absolutely perfect plan. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
