On 17.2.2015 12:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Not that I know of.
On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
I don't think there are any - feel free to file it.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think the F22 and Rawhide (Is it F23 at this point), should both use dnf
not yum. We need to get more testing on dnf in containers.
I'm ready to start testing F22 containers either way and would prefer
dnf. What's the best process to get this rolling? Who owns the image -
release engineering or Project Atomic? The reason I ask is that
Project Atomic has their own mailing list and uses Trac, not the Red
Hat Bugzilla, for issue tracking.
Either way, my main upstream component (RStudio Server) may end up
stuck with F21 - it doesn't link with the latest Boost right now and
they only support CentOS and Debian/Ubuntu.
Vaclav is handling this right now. I don't see this as owned by
ProjectAtomic.
The problem currently is I am not able to build any Fedora image due to
some Anaconda problems. I'll get back to you as soon as I have something
helpful.
Vašek
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Developer Experience
Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
