On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:43:26 +0100 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are bugs being fixed both on the gcc side and on the side of > packages, I think it is too early for the final mass rebuild, but gcc > should be ready for that in a short time. For the gcc side of > bugfixing it doesn't help that there is a huge delay due to extremely > underpowered armv7hl builders > - what builds in 4 hours or less on all other primary and secondary > architectures builds for 18 or more hours on armv7hl. Yeah. We are working on coming up with a solution that will let us use aarch64 boxes to build armv7 (which should be much faster), but that is still all up in the air. > Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package > order, would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes > one needs to rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ > packages or C++ packages that nothing C++ depends on of course can be > left for the mass rebuild, but ideally the rest should be rebuilt > manually before the mass rebuild. Right. Mass rebuilds don't update the buildroot, they are done in a side tag. So, everything is rebuild and tagged in, but it won't help at all things needing rebuild after something else. kevin
Attachment:
pgphWSlT87GA3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
