On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:08:23 +0100 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/16/2015 06:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Probibly in the next few weeks as soon as gcc5 is ready > > I do not understand. > > - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to > push GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1] FESCo decided to not do a mass rebuild for f22, but gcc-5 (with a change to config from f23) was approved to land in f22. > - A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and already _is_ being used to > build packages and causing all kind of weird issue there. These > issues also cause harm to F22, because we have a "build rawhide > first" rule. Yes, but as far as I know the gcc maintainers are still patching up issues found via these bugs. It would be good to actually fix those in gcc before we go rebuilding everything with it. So, it's somewhat up to gcc maintainer(s) IMHO... when they feel gcc-5 is ready to rebuild everything. > => IMHO, you should start a GCC-5.0/c++ rebuild at least on rawhide, > RSN and not resort to postponing it "some time in future". This would be a decision for FESCo and/or releng. I was just providing my opinion on it. > Ralf > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192886 kevin
Attachment:
pgp8HVAQA08ov.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
