On 27. 1. 2015 at 11:29:43, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here... > >> > >> Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to > >> eventually become yum? If dnf is "good enough" to start using it in > >> production, should the discussion be around dnf -> yum transition? > > > > I think that was dropped a long time ago. dnf isn't going to become yum in > > some sort of rename. It will be a seperate command and while its syntax > > will be similar it is not 100% (eg you won't be able to use a yum plugin > > to > > work with dnf) > > Ahh, I hadn't seen that. Well, since the name is no longer temporary I > would like to say that it's a terrible name :) :-) FYI: http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/03/12/on-the-name/ Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
