On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:18:31PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > NetworkManager is not intended only for mobile devices or notebooks, > because that's a small part of the networking story. Plus, more than > just notebooks have needs for the things that NetworkManager brings to > the table. > > If it's useful for you, that's great. If you do not find it useful, > that's also fine, and it can be masked. However, we have put great > effort into NM so that even if it *is* enabled, it can coexist > peacefully with whatever you do on the system outside of NM, and we are > constantly improving this. > > We hope that NM can be installed on most systems, and will be there when > required and useful, but will get out of the way when not required. What's the story for NM in router configurations? The last time I brought up handling DHCPv6-PD (a strong non-laptop use case for NM if I ever saw one), I was told that router configurations were out of scope for NM (at least, at that point in time). Has that changed? (Or maybe I'm misremembering some nuance...) -- Scott Schmit
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
