On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should I switch mock to use DNF as default? >>>>>> For me there is still lot of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what --installroot should actually do [BZ 1163028] >>>>> I don't think it's ready, it might be useful to have an option to >>>>> switch it over for local use to enable easier wider testing but I >>>>> certainly don't think it's ready to be default for mock yet. >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>> I am using mock for Fedora development with DNF enabled by default and >>>> it works just fine. May be you want to share what is troubling you? >>> There is a difference between « it works just fine for me » and « it >>> works to build the distro » >>> >>> The latter needs much more testing and guarantees than the former, >>> although the former is certainly encouraging. >>> >>> >> >> If somebody says "I certainly don't think it's ready to be default for >> mock yet.", I expect him to have strong evidence that something is >> wrong, not that something needs more testing. > > If somebody says that it's ready to go I would expect them to have > used mock to rebuild the entire distribution and prove that it works, > preferably twice actually once as an initial run from the original yum > builds [... ] Yes because everyone has the resources and equipment to do that .. oh wait. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
