On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:02 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 01/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>> It is surprising to see so many packges depending on yum. Yes, there is > >>> stuff like rpm-build and mock, > >> And mock can live without yum. If we only had weak deps allowed in Fedora mock.spec would have > >> Recommends: yum > >> > >> But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should I switch mock to use DNF as default? > >> For me there is still lot of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what --installroot should actually do [BZ 1163028] > > I don't think it's ready, it might be useful to have an option to > > switch it over for local use to enable easier wider testing but I > > certainly don't think it's ready to be default for mock yet. > > > > Peter > > I am using mock for Fedora development with DNF enabled by default and > it works just fine. May be you want to share what is troubling you? There is a difference between « it works just fine for me » and « it works to build the distro » The latter needs much more testing and guarantees than the former, although the former is certainly encouraging. -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
