On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;) >> >> BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty. >> What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one >> before F21 Beta? > > This is actually that reason I liked how we constructed schedule last two > releases - based on proposed changes, taking look what needs mass rebuild > etc. And it could even end with no mass rebuild (or mass rebuild request > can come on Jan-20 when the deadline for changes is). But I was alone > who liked the old-new way and FESCo decided to set schedule the old-old > way, I'm just the guy who puts it to the wiki :). You aren't alone. I'm still not convinced the strict time-based schedule will work, but most of FESCo wanted to give it a shot. Rather then be a stick in the mud, I went with "don't be afraid to fail". Who knows, maybe it will work out. If it does, I think it's going to change some of the things people expect from Fedora in both good and bad ways. Good, delivered on time. Bad (maybe), delivered with less cutting-edge packages. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
