Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>>>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is >>>>> that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on >>>>> glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number of packages: >>>>> >>>>> $ repoquery --source --whatrequires 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)' | sort >>>>> | uniq | wc -l >>>>> 2834 >> The additional sed should remove the duplicated versions: >> >> $ repoquery --source --whatrequires 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)' | sort >> -u | sed -r 's/(.*)-.*-.*/\1/' | uniq | wc -l >> 2645 >> > And the wildcard in libc makes the difference :) So these seems to be > numbers for Rawhide: > > $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --source --whatrequires > 'libc.so.6*' | sort -u | sed -r 's/(.*)-.*-.*/\1/' | uniq | wc -l > 7402 > > $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src > '*' | wc -l > 16230 > > I.e. 45.6 % of packages seems to be written in C/C++ And it seems that this is the number of packages written in C++: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --source --whatrequires 'libstdc++.so.6*' | sort -u | sed -r 's/(.*)-.*-.*/\1/' | uniq | wc -l 2396 I'd like to point out at this place, that this would help also the 5006 packages written in C, since they don't need C++ to build. Only 14.8 % of packages, which happens to be written in C++, would not benefit from this change. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
