Re: Qwt and QwtPolar for Qt5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Johansen wrote:

> I took the same approach of adding -qt5 to the .so files and such, but it
> sounds like it's worth waiting to see what upstream is going to do before
> committing to anything in EPEL and the Fedora stable releases. Is there
> any estimate of when that decision will be made?

No estimate, but hopefully upstream is coming around to this being a good 
idea (there seems to be some resistance and misunderstanding from them that 
I just don't understand).  Here's the start of the thread I started on the 
topic,
http://sourceforge.net/p/qwt/mailman/qwt-interest/thread/54787E9A.6040108%40tigertal.de/#msg33089562

At least debian seems on board with my proposal now, so hopefully that will 
carry some weight.

-- Rex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux