----- Original Message ----- > Hi Bastien, > > On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >>> Meeting summary > >>> --------------- > >>> * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37) > >>> > >>> * #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control > >>> (geppetto, 17:06:19) > >>> * ACTION: General agreement that it should be made at least a static > >>> lib. … hopefully a shared lib. eventually. (geppetto, 17:20:11) > >>> > >> Per the FPC decision that libgnome-volume-control is not an acceptable > >> copylib, and therefore it has to be packaged as a static lib and > >> packages using it modified to use it, some questions: > >> > >> 1. who should be performing the modification? > >> 2. presumably reviews of new packages depending on this would be blocked > >> until such a static lib is available? > >> 3. presumably whereas legacy packages that have already gone in are > >> fine, we won't want to yank them > > > > That won't happen. > > > Presumably you're refering to #3 here? Or you're saying there won't be a > libgnome-volume-control static lib? The whole goal of using a git submodule is so that we don't offer to 3rd-parties a library, and so that we can change the API without any problems. Using a static library offers all the disadvantages and none of the advantages of using a git submodule. So it won't be changed upstream, or downstream. I'm guessing the FPC hasn't found out about the libgd git-submodule yet... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
