Re: Other download options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Mike Pinkerton <pselists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Primarily the uncertainty of what changes the Workstation WG has made,
> coupled with Matthew Miller's comments that:
>
> <deletia>
>
> I also don't know whether Workstation updates will pull in other similarly
> bad ideas in the future, and whether I would have to re-audit all of the
> configuration after each update.
>
I understand the frustration. This case has pointed out some areas
where the communications process could be improved (though I expect
the number of subscribers to the workstation mailing list has gone up
dramatically in the last few days). Your reasons for avoiding using
Workstation don't seem that new, though. Changes have always been able
to pass under the radar, either because of process failure, or the
simple fact of missing the email thread. Going forward, I'd hope the
WGs will use this as an example to better communicate WG-specific
changes, but relying on out-of-the-box configuration to match your
desired state doesn't seem sustainable.


Thanks,
BC

-- 
Ben Cotton
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux