On 9 December 2014 at 11:35, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 10:49 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> If Reindl, Kevin or Tomas want to disagree with that, I'll give you a >> little >> exercise: >> Having just installed and updated my Fedora 20, I want to share a >> video in my >> home directory using UPnP/DLNA to my TV, using rygel for example. >> Document the >> steps necessary to achieve that. > > So unless anyone opposed to the firewall configuration change actually > attempts this exercise, and comes up with a working alternative solution > to the problem, I'm not sure there's much point in continuing the > discussion. > Well, without access to Bastien's TV, home directory and router it's a bit difficult. Or is that the point? I haven't used rygel, is there any reason to believe difficulty doing this is not a problem with rygel in F20? > We are concerned with practical security -- keeping the user safe by > anticipating the user's typical response to situations. But if you think > the firewall configuration GUI in F20 existed for any purpose other than > to completely disable the firewall, please take a reality check. "This isn't quite as bad as that other thing." Isn't the most persuasive argument, and in some cases it is worse (at least a user who's disabled the firewall knows they've done so). -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
