On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 01:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote: > > 2) juffed was broken by > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14301/ . Interestingly > > enough the update passed the Taskatron depcheck test there, even though it > > created a new broken dependency in the repo. > > The Taskatron depcheck appears to be broken or incomplete: It might be > effective at checking whether the new package has any broken dependencies, > but it definitely does not appear to check whether the update breaks OTHER > packages' dependencies (at least I've seen 2 instances where it didn't catch > that, and this is the third). The old AutoQA got that right. http://tirfa.com/current-state-of-depcheck-and-paths-forward.html I'm sort-of volunteered to write the approach I suggested in a comment as a new test, but it's going to have to wait until at least post-f21. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
