Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/15/2014 11:52 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:20:03PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> 
>> To avoid that, I'll file a FESCo ticket next Monday to approve dropping
>> the following packages, unless they get fixed first:
> 
> I can do the mass retirement if there is a final list and decision.

Thanks Till.

> Did you check that there are not packages listed that were just
> recently broken?

Most of those are longstanding (broken for more than a month), with two
exceptions:

1) gdesklet-SlideShow and gdesklets-citation depend on gdesklets which
appears to have been retired recently;

2) juffed was broken by https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14301/ .
Interestingly enough the update passed the Taskatron depcheck test
there, even though it created a new broken dependency in the repo.

> Also do you propose to retire the package only in F21 or also in 
> Rawhide?

My gut feeling is to retire the broken packages in Rawhide as well, but
it's ultimately up to FESCo to decide what to do.

-- 
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux