Re: LLVM 3.5 rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> i can take a look at llvmpy this week, but i'd recommend just retiring
> it otherwise. it can come back if it has to.

I was going to retire it before, but upstream had a patch,

Its jsut a wrapper aruond the API, it probably needs to be developed
in sync with llvm, and so far I haven't seen any upstream dedication to
doing so.

The thing is then llvmpy will hve an unstable API, which means the llvmpy
users will need changing for every llvm release.

Dave.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux