Re: LLVM 3.5 rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 19:16 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> > 2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon.
> 
> I would be too, but I'm going to want 3.5 in F21, and we have this whole
> thing about not retiring packages in a live release.
> 
> Perhaps I should just barge ahead with a compat-llvm34?
> 

i can take a look at llvmpy this week, but i'd recommend just retiring
it otherwise. it can come back if it has to.

--kyle
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux