Hi, I was looking into what I need to do to have my fonts in displayed in gnome-software. They all seem to fail with <veto>appdata required</veto>. Am I correct in assuming that appdata for all (or almost all?) fonts is generated by https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/blob/master/appdata-tools/create-font-appdata.py ? So should I add an appdata files for fonts I maintain, or is it enough to have them in https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/blob/master/appdata-tools/fonts.csv? Zbyszek On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:12:12PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 October 2014 19:50, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I noticed Titillium typeface is unlisted in Gnome Software. How to > >> include it? I tried to look at the documentation about the process but > >> not available. > > https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/tree/master/appdata-extra/font > > These files are to set the long description for the font, and > optionally also group together font faces together into families, e.g. > so Lato Black gets paired up with Lato Hairline to form a "Lato" > super-font. > > > and there is appdata for them in /usr/share/app-info/xml/ on my system, > > but for some reason they still don't show up in gnome-software. Kalev > > and I briefly looked into it, but couldn't quite figure it out. I'll ask > > Richard to take a look tomorrow (he's off today). > > Unlike applications, the AppData for fonts only gets processed when > the metadata is created using appstream-builder. This is because for > applications there's a 1:1 relationship with .desktop files, but for > addons like fonts the relationship can be n:1 or even 1:n. > > So, back to the builder. I think this is the log file for Titillium: > https://github.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/blob/master/campivisivi-titillium-fonts.log > -- which looking at the last entry seems to suggest (no <veto> tags) > that it gets included in the metadata, at least for rawhide. > > So, to check locally: vim /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-21.xml.gz > seems to suggest that Titillium should be present in gnome-software. > So, running the latter in verbose mode I see; > > (org.gnome.Software:9724): GsPlugin-WARNING **: failed to load cached > icon Titillium-LightItalic.png: Failed to open file > '/usr/share/app-info/icons/fedora-21/Titillium-LightItalic.png': No > such file or directory > > Not good, as that file does not indeed exist, although the others > (e.g. Titillium-Black.png do). This kinda points to it being a > metadata builder issue. I'll look more at this now. > > Richard. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
