On 10/6/14 9:26 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Obviously we aren't in xfs/e2fsprogs territory, but it'll fix 90% of > the problems and then the other 10% are just a matter of having an > example to work off of. Thanks, > > Josef Josef, just as a datapoint: after corrupting 32k random bytes on a 2G image lightly populated and made with default mkfs options, then running fsck with all of your recent fixes, I got 9 mount failures out of 20 attempts, 55% success. Running the same test, but w/ 2 devices, each randomly damaged to the same extent, and created with -m raid1 -d raid0, I get 10 failures out of 20, 50% success. (Note that this is just a low-bar "will it mount" test, I'm not looking at what's in the repaired filesystem at all). What sort of testing yielded your 90% success rate? Thanks, -Eric -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
