Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 04.10.2014 um 00:29 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: 
> 
>     "generic drugs" is the one thing nobody wants to have in context honestly
> 

> Not true  but irrelevant anyway since I was just pointing out that generic is not a technical term.
> 
>     why would you try to force somebody to a "prodcut setup"
>     if he can't give you an answer to the question "which"?
> 
> Noone is forcing anything since non productized variants are continued to be supported but the emphasis is on the
> products (whether you think it should be is a different discussion) and as you confirmed, the use of the term
> "standard" doesn't convey that to the user

and *because* non productized variants are continued there should
be no emphasis instead *equal options* - the products make sense
for a user who can answer within 5 seconds sitting in front of
the option to chose the question which one is the best for him

i bet many can't because they would need multiple choice

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux