Am 02.10.2014 um 16:50 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:47:08PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 02.10.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Richard Hughes: >>> On 2 October 2014 15:17, Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from a Software manager, >>>> because they don't live up to some visual quality guidelines. >>> >>> There's actually a whole load of reasons why we'd blacklist >>> applications: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib#guidelines-for-applications >>> for instance programs that identify themselves as "settings" or apps >>> that haven't had an upstream release in 5 years >> >> don't get me wrong but "haven't had an upstream release in 5 years" >> is a silly reasoning - if an application works and has the feature >> set it was intended to provide upstream needs to open the changelog >> type there "to make some distribution clown happy", raise the version >> number and the maintainer in the distribution too has useless work? > > You may disagree and say so, but calling anyone a clown is not going to make > your argument stronger, quite the contrary in fact. > Please do not resolve to personal attack on this list you misunderstood me *that* would be the exact message i would write in the log a upstream maintainer if someone tells me my application which works just fine needs a update because it otherwise is not displayed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
