On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:47:08PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 02.10.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Richard Hughes: > > On 2 October 2014 15:17, Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from a Software manager, > >> because they don't live up to some visual quality guidelines. > > > > There's actually a whole load of reasons why we'd blacklist > > applications: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib#guidelines-for-applications > > for instance programs that identify themselves as "settings" or apps > > that haven't had an upstream release in 5 years > > don't get me wrong but "haven't had an upstream release in 5 years" > is a silly reasoning - if an application works and has the feature > set it was intended to provide upstream needs to open the changelog > type there "to make some distribution clown happy", raise the version > number and the maintainer in the distribution too has useless work? You may disagree and say so, but calling anyone a clown is not going to make your argument stronger, quite the contrary in fact. Please do not resolve to personal attack on this list. Pierre
Attachment:
pgpg0I8hJ0zGS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
