On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:32:08PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > >> > >> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion > >> snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is: > >> $ pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-completion > >> More info in /usr/share/doc/bash-completion/README > > > > Apparently most packages haven't gotten the memo. Are there bug reports filed? Is this tracked somewhere? Is it ok for a provenpackager to step in and fix it across the repository? > > And in my opinion this is > something that maintainers should discuss with upstreams, and not > something that should be done only in Fedora, let alone be done by > provenpackagers. In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in Fedora. Installed software genenerally does not care where its bash-completion files installed, or even if they are installed at all. Every file removed from /etc/bash_completion.d brings us closer to having actual configuration files in /etc, and is a worthy goal. > If the completion files are not upstream, they should > be submitted there. That too, but it seems an independent issue. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
