Re: Is there another Java Mass Rebuild scheduled for Fedora 21?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/23/2014 05:08 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
> On 09/23/2014 10:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> For log4j12, I don't see any problem. Can you provide more details?
> 
> A bug was fixed in log4j12 that moved the jar from _jnidir to _javadir,
> thus breaking the symlinks in packages built before the change.

I see. This probably should be fixed in log4j12. Can you file a bug?

>>> Is there a plan to do another mass rebuild of the java bits?  If not,
>>> can we schedule one?
>>
>> We're already after Alpha release, I don't think we can or should have
>> any mass rebuild. Instead we should focus on finding and fixing bugs in
>> individual packages.
> 
> The fix for me is easy as a simple rebuild fixes my problem.  It doesn't
> help solve the problem for any other packages that might have the same
> problems or others dependencies that aren't affecting my package.  The
> list of affected packages is potentially pretty long for these two
> issues so that's why I suggested a mass rebuild.  Is there another
> option other than having all affected package maintainers inspect their
> packages and rebuild if necessary?

You can identify packages with broken symlinks and file bug reports.
Once fixed we can submit updates through bodhi.

-- 
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux