Re: [systemd-devel] I wonder… why systemd provokes this amount of polarity and resistance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
>> out *all* systemd logs because just the excessive *user
>> session* logging and that this messages should not exist
>> at all in a non-debugging environment
> 
> IIUC , this messages doesn't exist in a non-debugging environment since
> ends of Apr [1], or I shut up this messages somehow , I don't
> remember ...

* i shut up them with "loginctl enable-linger"
* that's a workaround
* doing so in F20 to prevent forget with F21 leads to
  another bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619#c54

it is even *possible* that it was changed but if so it shows
several problems:

* nobody knows, people already built workarounds
* it takes too long for any reaction on such issues
  so that people can't or won't wait for a response
  and try to find bugreports because lost hope that
  things become better in a reasonable time
* the reaction close with "NOTABUG" after weeks of ignore is wrong

frankly that was once introduced even in F19 backports and
quickly fixed while also point to "loginctl enable-linger"
which is *really* a dirty workaround leading the user sessions
are started at boot before the first cronjob fires up which
wastes ressources at boot

only that it was fixed in a short because that backport was
not targeted for F19 shows how easy it could be changed if
upstream would care about downstream in any way

look at the response from Johann directed to downstream in general,
Fedora and FeSCO in special and the repeatet responses "we are upstream
and this and that are downstream problems we don't care" shows how
terrible wrong things are going

a upstream of a *critical core componentent* with a "i don't care
about downstream" attitude is only one thing: dangerous


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux