On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> 1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file. > >> 2) I later update the package which removes bar.rb file. > >> 3) And I call some_function which fails due to missing bar.rb > > > > How is this not 'foo' simply being broken? ie. Not expressing its > > needs properly in its RPM dependencies? > > > > It would still have been broken even with a reboot > > no - why should it? > > 'foo' is loaded in memory, updated and now has different dependencies > no longer require 'bar.rb' but your running version still do Please read closely. 'foo' has *not* been updated. If 'foo' had been updated, we would have spotted it and restarted that process using my technique outlined in the previous email. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
