Re: Future changes in the new package and new branch processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/08/2014 06:12 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 05:23:15AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

I think the only safe way is to create an empty branch and not to populate
it, because there are many constraints to be considered before a package can

My proposal is to point new branches to the first commit in the master
branch in each repo.

I fail to understand the rationale for this. It doesn't make any sense to me. The pkgdb simply doesn't have any knowledge about what is right or wrong.

Imagine you were going to branch a package for EPEL5. If you are going to populate it from master, the likelihood, this package will be incompatible to EPEL5 is almost 100%.

This is also what is done initially, when a new
repo is set up. "Empty branches", i.e. only the ACL but no commit in the
branch might lead to maintainers accidentally creating the wrong branch.
I fail to understand once more. "Empty branches" are the status quo ever since Fedora is using git. I feel you are trying to introduce a solution to a non-problem,


Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux