On 09/05/2014 09:27 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > >> >> system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to >> configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree >> with you about the root user usage. you imho those who would like to >> configure disk and lvm should have to be root privileges and should have >> to know what he does. it's again so lennartish when you belive a buggy >> pulse is better then a working alsa if the concept is better. NO simple >> it's not true. a usable working program always better the a perfectly >> design idealism which never really works. > > I don' think this is a productive direction to take this discussion in. > This has nothing to do with Lennart, alsa or idealism. Separating the > privileged mechanism from the UI is really not 'design idealism', but > simply with good engineering practice. Pointing this out is not being a > 'negative nelly' either, but providing constructive feedback. if you read lennart mail you can see "it's a step back" which is an idealism and which is what i really replying. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
