On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:11:58 -0500 Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once upon a time, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > > > wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, > > > when people leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are > > > properly orphaned or get a new owner? > > > > Why would even someone's employment status matter? Fedora is a > > community project. > > I would assume that when someone leaves Red Hat, their @redhat.com > email address is deactivated, at which point their FAS account with > that @redhat.com address will no longer work. > > Fedora is a community project, but the basic fact is that there is a > significant amount of @redhat.com involvement underlying that > community. Somebody at Red Hat knows when an @redhat.com address goes > invalid; it would make the Fedora processes easier if that > information was communicated when the address is also in FAS. They are doing so. ;) That is why I sent the email that started this thread. > I don't see a problem with _any_ company with corporate involvement > with Fedora having the same ability to say "this email is no longer > valid" and triggering an immediate "unresponsive maintainer" > process. It is just that Red Hat is the prime example. 100% agreed. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
