On 08/20/2014 07:14 PM, Christopher wrote:
> As a hypothetical, I was mainly concerned about backporting a new F21 java
> package as a F20 update to make it available to users still on that
> version, and whether that would require javadocs. Just in case, I've added
> a "%if 0%{fedora} < 21" condition for javadocs, and the appropriate
> Obsoletes line when the condition fails (>=20), but that's more to maintain
> in the specfile, and it'd be much simpler to just not declare any
> subpackaging for javadocs.
Then you can provide javadocs in all Fedora versions.
javadoc subpackages are still nice thing to have. Most of Java libraries
keep installing them in F21+ and there are no plans of dropping them.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
