On Saturday, July 19, 2014, 8:20:30 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> How about not rebuilding the chroot every time... It's not like you have to >> worry about leftover BR's from building another package. > That could lead to packages that happen to build some of the time due > to an undetected dependency on something that isn't in the BR but > happens to be in a cached buildroot. Then you would at least get failure or a working package. Just because a package builds without failure doesn't mean it is the intended build. A less desirable case would be a package with optional build dependencies, that gets built with different configurations based on the presence of extra packages that happen to be in that cached buildroot. Having the required packages for build and no more is important. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
