Re: Pushing out-of-sync updates to EPEL stable: Problematic?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:01:20 -0500
John Morris <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There was a recent flurry of updates to the new freecad package, with 
> one Bodhi update including updates to OCE and smesh [1].
> 
> A following update to freecad was pushed to stable before the
> previous one, which contained the OCE update, was pushed, as a user
> reported [2].
> 
> Clearly, the OCE and smesh updates need to be pushed to stable.  Will
> it cause problems that the obsolete freecad package is part of the
> same update?  Of course I hope that the current freecad, with a newer
> package revision, would 'win' and the obsolete freecad would be
> dropped from the update, but I don't want any surprises.

It might not. 

You could edit the update and removing that package from it... 

or if you are already pushing it to stable, ping me (or other folks on
#fedora-releng) to check and make sure the right one is tagged in. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux