-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/03/2014 05:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Lennart Poettering > wrote: >>> In a sense, there's a certain amount of this definition that >>> every Fedora install will have. The Products then add to this >>> definition. A basic piece of it is mandatory, but the outer >>> edges are add-ons. >> I am not sure this is really what /etc/os-release is for. It's >> for declaring operating system names and versions, not really for >> containing a list of packages you have installed. > > We're not (ultimately, at least), just talking about a list of > packages. It is like a sub-version of the operating system. A > "flavor", perhaps. Using a different ID and ID_LIKE=fedora seems a) > far too heavy and b) expressive of a much larger difference. > Well, given that the standard doesn't *really* have this level of nuance, I'm inclined to agree with this approach. So we'd have ID=fedora-cloud ID_LIKE=fedora and so on. It doesn't really seem likely to cause too much confusion, IMHO. > I *do* like that you're planning to move this to /usr/lib. It never > made sense to me as _configuration_. > > Agreed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO6mWoACgkQeiVVYja6o6PdZwCfZcnWJK6A6L3cxHzBPB776LRj f48Anj6nyCYYxuke8j6G2ouuy33evibh =fE/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
