-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2014 04:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Any chance that systemd wants to build a hostnamectl-like >> interface for setting the os-release values? That would make life >> a lot easier on us, as we could reconfigure that file if-and-when >> a fedora-release-$PRODUCT package was installed in a %post >> snippet. > What would be the advantage over including /usr/lib/os-release in > the package directly? What kinds of fields could be modified in > this way? > Well, ideally we'd like the majority of the file to be owned by fedora-release and then just add the one or two additional fields specific to the products programmatically. I suppose though that we could just carry complete duplicates in each fedora-release-* package. Particularly if we end up adding a fedora-release-nonproduct (or however we name it) package to solve the depsolving issues as suggested by James Antill. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOxxacACgkQeiVVYja6o6MoOACbB9WcFYb2rOZfrZvXjcW+lGGC G4YAoJ5aeFwqV7O4MIDR8D2nEuQaZKY/ =BFiB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
