Re: Handling package conflicts caused by arch specific doc files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> /home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
>>> total 44K
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser  36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
>>
>> Thanks, this actually backs up what I claimed -- that it's uncommon to
>> build i686 packages on an x86_64 host. You only have an x86_64 directory
>> here.
> 
> Again -devel packages are not only used / useful for building rpms

that's true

but usually you don't ./configure && make && make install for a i686
binary on a x86_64 machine since it's anyways a local build

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux