Am 03.07.2014 13:20, schrieb Kalev Lember: > On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> /home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS: >> total 44K >> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch >> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64 > > Thanks, this actually backs up what I claimed -- that it's uncommon to > build i686 packages on an x86_64 host. You only have an x86_64 directory > here. that is indeed true, a samll build-VM with only i686 is more comfortable / less error prone than cross-building > Out of curiosity, I know you are administering a number of systems -- do > you only have x86_64 installations or do you use a different host for > building i686 packages? until 2011 i had a "buildserver32.vmware.local" to feed my notebook with the exact same configuration and a sync-script, finally all packages are grabbed from another host providing repos now only x86_64 and luckily the "oldest" CPU to support is SandyBridge, hence the 1:1 rebuilds of some packages which are not modified from the src.rpm in /home/builduser/rpmbuild/rebuild optflags: x86_64 -m64 -O2 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx -fopenmp -mmmx -msse2 -msse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mavx -maes -mfpmath=sse -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -finline-limit=60 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
