On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/27/2014 07:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 >> drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but >>> bandwith capped vs. not. >>> >>> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to >>> find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for instance is >>> that it insists on generating the original rpm while creating an >>> uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed cycle during >>> updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz). >> >> >> I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it couldn't >> be gpg checked. > > > The signature is on the RPM header, not the payload. The RPM header only > lists digests of individual files (after decompression). > > So this shouldn't make a difference. OK so there is no reason not to do it really. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
