On 06/27/2014 07:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but
bandwith capped vs. not.
If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to
find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for instance is
that it insists on generating the original rpm while creating an
uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed cycle during
updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz).
I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it couldn't
be gpg checked.
The signature is on the RPM header, not the payload. The RPM header
only lists digests of individual files (after decompression).
So this shouldn't make a difference.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
