Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Mukundan Ragavan
<nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
> I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of
> implementation is a great idea!
>
> On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
>>
>> Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers...
>> have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?
>>
>
> Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven
> packager high? :)

No its very harmful. It drives contributors away because they cannot
.. well contribute.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux