-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of implementation is a great idea! On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these? > > Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... > have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? > Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven packager high? :) Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D ==================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTrIIpAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNTmcQAIGQ+HaTR36pU1gOydNJhTim clypJ8mCmKC81uWUvI8cFjN2y61gAf9vLsrSkbIP4vZoVIVhFODtWSuYrDhgdwaK 82+QZ89wvKqfq/aWSS8mlo1MJJ3vm7OhnI7zH+pbrVnbUmKbOd9tXapePJt6koXC S1Wyz/hBvqmXdafl/wGMFTBwieOe+bDRZTa6NNP4G8CksL1CNlg6L7oP3JWXtI0R 0dF3l9GUDSQGAN1+lQuGkmArTmiCqjr/lXQZR9OKMdcmXQhuEl+9kJd6klcMKI6r o6Qm5/4Pf3VKRixhUec88IA30YUDeqJP4IgNGv64fwI8uJgX65Fipxf7NxDyMJt9 em0EOKNKjQtwnb3R0zr+YDbaWUCFCZVuiTFTHkaG5ojwezWE11+nJ5zaiI9i6WOJ rxl7bbhG29MEBhnJaiDnm4Zdk38IEuCld6zcIe8tM0E7vkNTzLQ2BMyPyS5Jnwx6 UzuCfpzgMgfEMpE/j6r22prsEhbN/XEcd+vGkZpnFH1R/tTQcTFauiAc1UNODjpW A9TqidqHH/1wxCeVuZYupsAh2pYy18cC1MrrbkJ2OZl+qacog2xpz2O11p6gDKi+ dkt31JF6Ftgc7CIuMYuNVU3WmKyUcXFROd6dpmmykN3ouDR14Iq7FWea0OM8Dsjh UHCBmAQitu/csPghf2u7 =FOGa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
