Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips@xxxxxxxxx> said: >> Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if >> it's trying to remove hundreds of packages? > > Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor > package and the package manager lists 100+ dependent packages, you > should take notice and perhaps re-think what you are trying to do. > Second, if you decide you want to continue, you should look over the > list of packages to be removed. Of course, but how fast can a small three letter work like yum or dnf can be overlooked? I don't really see any benefit of not implementing it, if it makes an installation safer. But this whole discussion is pointless, because the people, who do the work will most likely decide the outcome! > > If people really want some magic protections in this case, rather than > having "special" packages, it should probably be based on the number of > affected dependent packages (and/or maybe a percentage of installed > packages). > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
